To The Queen's Bench: Regina, Refuse For Cause Without Dishonor.

[GhostChild]

As It Is My Will And My Right:
By YOUR Silence:
To The Reality Of My PERPETUAL SUCCESSION And Inherent Traditional Spiritual Chief:
As Royal Metis: Blood Guarrentor:
It Is Now That I Invoke This Right:
To Claim For The Safety And Protection For Kaneekaneet And His Sovereign Family:

Hereby; Is My Order:
I, Okimow-Wacon Nepakaneepawit/Scott Phillip Hayes:
As YOUR Inherent Traditional Spiritual Chief And YOUR PERPETUAL SUCCESSOR:
I Do Hearby Order:
THE QUEEN'S POWER AROUND Kaneekaneet:
As Indian Title Is Not Ajudicatable.....
As Treaty Rights Can Not Be NEGATIVELY Affected:
As Only SUBJECTS To/Of The CROWN:
CAN STAND BEFORE THE QUEEN'S BENCH:
(Kaneekaneet Is Sovereign Of Turtle Island:
He Is Who He Says He Is:
As No Challenge Came To His Claims:
Silence Is As Consent:
Thus He Is As I Say He Is To YOU ALL):

As A Trial By A JURY Not Of Kaneekaneet's "Sovereign Peer's":
Is A JURY WITH A VESTED INTEREST TOWARDS BIAS:
The "GOVERNMENT" Has No "BUSINESS" On The Reserves:
As The "CONSINTRATION CAMPS" Of Their Creditor's/Benefactor's/Beneficiary's
Your DARRYL BLAZE:"THE PRINCIPAL'S CROWN AGENT"
Has Failed To Make His Case...
I Have Councilled Kaneekaneet To Recind The "TREATY(S)":
With Her Majesty's COLONIAL CHILDREN.
YOU HAVE LEFT NO CHOICE:
WHEN YOU ASSUME THE RIGHT TO MAKE OUR CHOICES:

Whereas; "CORPORATIONS" Whom Used THEIR "Sovereign Crown":
As Scape Goat To Find Against Him:
To Cover Up For THEIR HISTORICAL CRIMES To Him:
Should Not Have Right To Amnesty:
So Offered In The Preamble Of The "Manifesto Directive."


I Have Done My Duty To Warn You All:
As A Co-[Author]-(Spiritual Being) Of The Manifesto Directive:
As Instructed By The Creator:
This Has All Been Very Real/VERY REAL:

Should This Order Fail:
Then It Is To Her Majesty To Prove Her Relevance As A Sovereign:
To The Proof Of Her Jurisdiction And To Her Sovereignty:
Over And Above Her COLONIAL CHILDREN Of REGINA, [SASKATCHEWAN]: [CANADA]:
For The Safety And Protection Of Kaneekaneet And His Sovereign Family:
Failure To Do So Will Amount To The Social Fact:
That NO SUCH CORPORATE JURISDICTION EXISTS:
NO SUCH POWERS ARE POSSESSED By Her:
Thus Removed:
All Becomes "Lean" And Put Down: Et Al.

"THE QUEEN'S POWER AROUND Kaneekaneet."
Is So Ordered By My Blood Garrentee:
To The Honor And The Diginity Of The "Treaty" Of Mutual Benefit:
May Her Rath For TREASON:
Be Based Within The Laws Of Her Jurisdiction:
Be Based In The Morality Charged To Her Office:
In Her Possession Of Her Juris Prudence:
And Rath Upon Her Agent's Only:
To Her Oath Respected To Her Favored Nations....
Provost Marshal:
You Have Instructions From Us:
Carry The Instructions Out Now.

Your Majesty:
You Also Have Instructions From Us:
You Also Have No Choice:
But To Prove To Your COLONIAL CHILDREN:
As THEIR CORPORATIONHEAD:
That You Still Can Flex Your RIGHTS FOR TREASONIST ACTS:
For At The End Of The Day:
To Withhold The BLACKROD:
Is To Spoil The COLONIAL CHILDREN:
And To Continue To INDULGE The COLONIAL CHILDREN:
With ILLUSIONS OF GRANDURE JURISDICTION:
NOT POSSESSED BY "Her" COLONIAL CHILDREN:
Is Directly A Deeper Breach Of Her ONIERIOUS CROWN FEDUCIAIRY OBILGATION:
To Her Favoured Nations:
Which By Her Silence Says Her Public Sentiment's:
Do Not Reflect Her Personal Responsiblilty To This Matter.

You Must Prove:
If You Are In Social Fact:
Queen Elizabeth II Alexandra Mary Windsor:
Relevant?:
Or: FICTIONAL?:
And Thus As "PRINCIPLE":
And As "Sovereign":
Responsible For The COLONIAL AGENT'S: "CORPORATE SCHEME":
For The All Death Of The Original People Of Her Favored Nation's:
For The Theft Of The Land's Resources:
By ASSIMILATION-ENFRANCISEMENT SCHEME:
By Her APPOINTEE'S/SUBORDINATE OFFICER'S/CROWN EMPLOYEE'S/VASSAL'S/SUBJECTS/DEBTOR'S: OF [CANADA]:
As So Proven In The Manifesto Directive And The Packages:
She Have Recieved:
To Her Private Person Notice:
And Thus Publicly:
Here By My Fire.

It Is My Wish And Deepest Regret To Invoke These Orders:
THE GOLDEN CIRCLE OF KNIGHTS:
ARE NOW CLOSED FOR BUSINESS:
As I Have Claim To YOUR LICENSE:
For Creator's Circle To Begin:
The Restoration Of The Supreme Jurisdiction Of Turtle Island.

As To The "CONVICTION" Of Kaneekaneet By A JURY NOT OF His Peer's:
"For The Possession Of Hemp For The Purpose Of Trafficking Hemp":
We Refuse Your Offer Without Dishonor. As FACTS In EVIDENCE PROVE NO "THC" Which Means:
No CORPORATE CRIME EXIST'S TO CORPORATELY: Ajudictate? No [LAW] There?.....Correct The Error's.

Sincerely Your Traditional Inherent Spiritual Chief: And YOUR PERPETUAL SUCCESSOR:

Okimow-Wacon Nepakaneepawit/INDIAN MOON RAVENSTONE(CORPORATE SHELL)/Scott Phillip Hayes/Royal Metis/The GhostChild/Of The Sovereign Soto Nation Of The Federation Of Anishinabe Nations Of The Great Turtle Island.

[GhostChild]

GhostChildren: It Is My Wish That You Send The Link To This List Of Emails....Thanking You In Advance!.....The GhostChild.

http://ghostchild.org/index.php?showtopic=...st=0&#entry2558

info@amnesty.ca, inquiries@canadians.org, canada@oneworld.net, toronto@hrw.org, action@amnesty.ca, civis@europarl.eu.int, stuart.mole@rcsint.org, adline.thornhill@rcsint.org, cnis@commonwealth.int, webteam@commonwealth.int, info@commonwealth.int, pcosecretariat@pco.x.gsi.gov.uk, judicial.committee@pco.x.gsi.gov.uk, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca, information@icj-cij.org, mail@icj-cij.org,

webmaster@icj-cij.org, info@curia.eu.int, premier@gov.ab.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca, premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, premier@gnb.ca, premier@gov.ns.ca, webprem@gov.on.ca, gbinns@gov.pe.ca, premier@mail.gov.nf.ca, NCamphaug@GOV.NU.CA, premier@gov.sk.ca, Stephen_Kakfwi@gov.nt.ca, premier@gov.nl.ca, premier.ministre@cex.gouv.qc.ca, pat.duncan@gov.yk.ca, premier@gov.nu.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, Copps.S@parl.gc.ca, Minister_Ministre@hc-sc.gc.ca, just@parl.gc.ca, jack@fed.ndp.ca, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca


contact@aptn.ca, news@aptn.ca, news@taiga-communications.com, feedback@leaderpost.canwest.com, Letters@GlobeAndMail.ca, assiniboia.times@sasktel.net, carillon@ursu.uregina.ca, letters@nationalpost.com, pmedition@regina.cbc.ca, amradio@regina.cbc.ca, globalnews.reg@globaltv.ca, marlon.marshall@leader-post.sk.ca, globalnews.sas@globaltv.ca

[GhostChild]

SHAME:

http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/new...80e216d&k=11324

Jurors at Regina trial view DVD displaying images of drug operation
Barb Pacholik, Leader-Post
Published: Saturday, January 26, 2008

A camera pans a beautiful double rainbow all the way to the end and the pot that the prosecution alleges would mean gold for six men charged in what has been called the province's largest marijuana grow-op.

Jurors at a Regina trial continued watching a DVD on Friday that appears like a how-to instructional video combined with someone's summer vacation clips. It gives a close-up look at how the plants were grown and cared for, as well as shots of sunsets, campfires, dragonflies, and a gopher frolicking in the prairie grass. Then it suddenly jumps to the money shot -- large greenhouses filled with bushy, green plants that an RCMP officer has identified as cannabis marijuana. "Action," someone yells, and two men, identified as two of the accused, are seen pulling a tarp closed on the greenhouse frame.

The three-hour movie is a compilation of seven video camera discs seized inside a teepee from which three men fled during a dawn raid on the site at the Pasqua First Nation. The Aug. 21, 2005 search, which included the RCMP's emergency response team (ERT), turned up more than 6,000 suspected marijuana plants, most of which were growing in six homemade greenhouses estimated to be about 60 by seven metres in size.
An aerial photograph of an area on the Pasqua First Nation where a marijuana grow-op was found by RCMP. To the left is where six large greenhouses were discovered.View Larger Image View Larger Image
An aerial photograph of an area on the Pasqua First Nation where a marijuana grow-op was found by RCMP. To the left is where six large greenhouses were discovered.
Bryan Schlosser, Leader-Post
Email to a friendEmail to a friendPrinter friendlyPrinter friendly
Font:

* *
* *
* *
* *

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

On trial for drug and weapons charges are Lawrence Hubert Agecoutay, 52, Chester Fernand Girard, 59, Nelson Edward Northwood, 58, Jack Allan Northwood, 55, Joseph Clayton Agecoutay, 47, and Robert Stanley Agecoutay, 48.

Ed Rodonets, a former RCMP corporal who has retired since the search, said it's quite common to find such images at a grow-op because people want "trophy photos."

While most of the alleged pot is housed inside the greenhouses -- fashioned from wooden planks, poles, ropes, and tarps - there are also video images showing the odd plant growing in a flower and vegetable garden.

The six largest greenhouses are numbered in black marker. Beside No. 1, someone has written "love" circled by a heart. Accompanying No. 2 is the word "moon" and a drawing of a happy-faced crescent moon. Beside No. 3 are the words "Happy face" along with the matching symbol. What appears to be dates are also written on some of the planks.

Under questioning by the defence, Rodonets, who has taken part in more than 50 grow-op busts, was repeatedly asked about the differences between marijuana and industrial hemp, which resembles pot but is grown legally for use in such things as clothing, food, and fuel. Rodonets said the plants at the Pasqua site were much bushier than the usually taller, thinner hemp, from which seeds and fibres are harvested. As well, he said most of the plants in the greenhouses were the non-seed producing females favoured by pot users, unlike the male plants primarily used for hemp. Some male plants were found in a separate building, where Rodonets suspected they were being used to produce seed for the next year.

Rodonets added that hemp has a much lower THC level (the chemical which produces the high in pot) and the seed sells for 50 cents a pound compared to marijuana at $1,500 to $3,000 a pound.

Under further cross-examination, Rodonets said he never checked to see if anyone at the Pasqua site, located near the homes of Joseph and Robert Agecoutay, had a permit to grow hemp or plants for a medicinal purpose.

But Rodonets admitted that while most illegal grow-ops are hidden, this one "was fairly open. It wasn't like it was concealed."

Asked about an apparent pot plant growing in a planter in front of Robert Agecoutay's house, Rodonets replied, "I was quite shocked to see that."

The trial continues Monday.

bpacholik@leaderpost.canwest.com


© Leader-Post 2008

http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/sto...f3-0e41b20bd934

Jury at Regina grow-op trial expected to continue deliberations
Leader-Post
Published: Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Jurors at a Regina drug trial for six men who argued the "Creator" told them to grow "medicine" to cure people -- not pot for profit as the prosecution contends -- were expected to resume deliberations Wednesday after being sequestered for the night.

In his final instructions Tuesday, Court of Queen's Bench Justice Frank Gerein told the seven-woman, five-man jury that they had heard much during the three-week long trial about the Anishinabe Nation of Turtle Island, Indian adoptions of white men, sovereignty of First Nations and immunity from Canadian laws -- but it doesn't matter.

"I tell you as a matter of law that nobody in this country -- whether aboriginal or otherwise -- enjoys immunity from the laws enacted by the Parliament of Canada," the judge said, adding each accused was prohibited from producing cannabis marijuana.
Email to a friendEmail to a friendPrinter friendlyPrinter friendly
Font:

* *
* *
* *
* *

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Central to the jury's deliberations is deciding what was in each accused's mind and whether or not he knew what they were growing.

On Aug. 21, 2005 an RCMP raid discovered more than 6,000 cannabis marijuana plants growing on the Pasqua First Nation near Fort Qu'Appelle. The bulk of the plants were in six large greenhouses and four smaller plots.

Lawrence Hubert Agecoutay, 52, Chester Fernand Girard, 59, Nelson Edward Northwood, 58, Jack Allan Northwood, 55, Joseph Clayton Agecoutay, 47, and Robert Stanley Agecoutay, 48, are charged with illegally producing marijuana between April 1 and Aug. 21, 2005 and possessing the drug for the purpose of trafficking.

Robert Agecoutay is charged with possessing a prohibited weapon (a sawed-off shotgun) while Girard faces an additional charge of forcible entry of a house.

In his closing arguments earlier this week, Crown prosecutor Darrell Blais suggested the men had come together to grow marijuana in the hopes of splitting a $3-million profit. He pointed to a document showing calculations and the names "Larry," "Chester" and "Us" to support that argument. He suggested the "Us" and the reference to the initials "N" "J" and "E" referred to brothers Nelson and Jack Northwood and another B.C. man named Ed, who isn't facing charges.

But the six defence lawyers argued the accused were motivated by altruism, not greed, with plans to grow "medicine."

Lawrence Agecoutay identified himself as the international, traditional, inherent and spiritual chief for the Turtle Island Indian Reserve -- a sovereign land not subject to the drug laws of Canada. The Regina man said he was instructed by the "Creator" to grow medicine to help his people with diabetes and cancer.

Through a Web site that advertised adoptions to the Anishinabe Nation, Lawrence Agecoutay met Chester Girard, who used his expertise to grow the plants. The Web site also brought Nelson Northwood from B.C. to be adopted by the Anishinabe Nation in hopes of dodging taxes, court heard.

Lawrence Agecoutay said they had a five-year plan to create a centre that would produce medicine, hemp clothes, and fuel. During the trial, the defence referred to the plants as "medicine" and "industrial hemp." But during his three-hour jury charge, Gerein said neither hemp nor marijuana for medicinal purpose can be legally grown without a permit. "There are no permits or licenses before you," the judge said.

The defence also raised questions about the level of THC (the active ingredient in marijuana that produces the high effect) in the seized plants. Court heard that while samples were analysed and found to be cannabis marijuana, no THC analysis was done because most of the plants were still a week away from the bud stage, where the THC is concentrated. "The talk of THC is really a red herring and has no place in your deliberations," he told the jury.

The judge told jurors they may believe the accused honestly believed they were not subject to the law or see them as honestly mistaken. However, that too is irrelevant since everyone is presumed to know the law.

"No accused can be absolved of criminal responsibility because he believed the prohibition against production of marijuana did not apply to him. It matters not how sincere the belief was," Gerein said.

In considering the accused's knowledge of what they were growing, the jury can consider if they actually knew the plants were marijuana, were aware of the need to make inquiries and deliberately failed to do so, or didn't want to know.

"If an accused honestly believed he was involved in the production of medicine, pure and simple, it is open to you to find it was an honest mistake of fact and that can be a defence," Gerein said. "However, if an accused knows he was involved in producing marijuana, but believed it would be used as medicine that is not a defence ... It matters not what it will be used for."

In explaining the concept, Gerein noted the Crown's key witness, Brian McConnell, who worked on site, said he was told the plants were medicine, but knew in his own mind they were marijuana. The judge cautioned the jury to be "extremely cautious" about McConnell's testimony since he was a participant in the grow operation and was given immunity on charges in exchange for his testimony.

bpacholik@leaderpost.canwest.com


© Leader-Post 2008

[GhostChild]

"In his final instructions Tuesday, Court of Queen's Bench Justice Frank Gerein told the seven-woman, five-man jury that they had heard much during the three-week long trial about the Anishinabe Nation of Turtle Island, Indian adoptions of white men, sovereignty of First Nations and immunity from Canadian laws -- but it doesn't matter."


Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.......It Does Matter When A Genocide For A Geocide Takes Place In Public: And No Body Wants To Notice: I Really Wish I Could Say All That Is In My Mind And Heart To This Matter: But I Am Wiser: As The Word Is Spreading...

It Is Only Matter Of Time Before All Is "Leaned" To The Hilt: And Jurisdiction Brought Under The Microscope And The COLONIAL PATHAGEN Correctly Identified: And Then The Medicine Will Arrive To Your Total Disbelief: But You Will Get Over It Quickly And Adjust Easily: As I Have Spent These Last Few Years Conditioning You To Accept It. It Is My Duty To The Supreme Jurisdiction Of The Original People To Make Sure You Will....The GhostChild.

[owlmon]

deal with the dead and you reap the law of the dead

[GhostChild]

And The Choir Sang Back: Amen!

See We Agree From Our Different Ends Of The Matter....Now Help Me Remove The Smell Of CORPORATE DEATH: And We Will Having Something Deeper To Share Then.

I Wonder About The Facts In Evidence: Was The JURY Bribed And Then Threatened That Night When All Those Suits Took The JURY To Dinner? Or Was It The Other Way Around? Or Was Just Bribe Or Was It Just Threat? Did The SUITS In Fact: Just Explain The Landlord And Tenant Situation: As Kaneekaneet Is The Landlord And The Rent Is Still Due For The Last 150 Years?

Where Are The Annuity's For Resources Of The Land Consumed: For The Last 150 Years: Who Has Paid The Soto Nation For The Use Of The Land Beneath The FICTION Of [REGINA] in The FICTION Of [SASKATCHEWAN] Also Floating Magically Above His Land?

One Question SUITS: Where Is The "Sovereign License" For The City Of [REGINA]? In Fact: Where Is The "Sovereign License" For The (P)rovince Of [SASKATCHEWAN]?

Without A "Sovereign License": What Right Do EITHER Have To Conduct Trade And Commerce On His Land? Something To Learn About Before The Lot Of YOU Go To Jail: As It Is My Displeasure You Have Earned For YOUR "MANAGEMENT ROLE IN THIS MATTER:

Now My Thought's Turn To The RCMP And The [REGINA] CITY POLICE: If You Learned Anything: I AM Right: And Your Silence Reinforces It......Protection And Safety Is Now Your Mission I Impose Upon YOU BOTH: As Well....Did 300 CROWN EMPLOYEE'S Get Fired From The FICTION=DE FACTO And BANKRUPT=(P)rovince Of [SASKATCHEWAN]?

I Think The LEADER-POST NEEDS AN ENIMA....I Wonder...Where Is The LEADER-POST'S "Sovereign License" To Conduct Their TRADE AND COMMERCE?

Can Someone Let Me Know?.....We Are All Still Lost In The Misty Mist Of [CANADA'S] ORIGINS Naked And Alone At The End Of The Day Of The Matter At Hand.....The GhostChild.

[Prairyearth]

Regina grow-op trial draws strong reaction from community

Barb Pacholik
Leader-Post


Friday, February 15, 2008


The use of culture, treaty rights, and religion by six men in their defence on drug charges has sparked outrage among some First Nations people.

During the 15-day trial which ended this week, the Leader-Post received phone calls and letters raising concerns about the reasons the accused offered for creating a massive marijuana grow-op potentially worth millions. The group's leader said he is a traditional chief who was told by the "Creator" to grow "medicine" for his people.

"They're hiding behind their culture," Eleanor Dubois said. Formerly of the Pasqua First Nation, where the grow-op was discovered, Dubois followed the case from her home in Alberta.

"I am offended and embarrassed by the claims that this operation was requested by the Creator," she said. "To use culture and spirituality to mask criminal activity is to exploit that culture and spirituality and that is shameful beyond measure."

Joe Northwest worries the claims may reflect poorly on all of the First Nations community. "I'm offended because I'm an elder. And this is against my beliefs and my values to have some man mock my beliefs," said the Regina man. "A lot of people are saying, 'What is he doing? . . . Is he just trying to make First Nations people look like fools?'"

The controversy stems from the case of six men charged with producing marijuana after an Aug. 21, 2005 search found more than 6,000 plants in greenhouses. Three men were acquitted, but the jury convicted Lawrence Hubert Agecoutay, 52, his brother Robert Stanley Agecoutay, 48, and Chester Fernand Girard, a 59-year-old white Ontario man who paid for his adoption by the First Nations group by cultivating the plants.

Family head Lawrence Agecoutay testified he is Chief Ka-Nee-Ka-Neet -- the seventh generation, international, traditional, inherent and spiritual chief for the Anishnabe Federation of Sovereign Nations. A seal on letters identifies him as the head chief of the Anishinabe Nations of Turtle Island Indian Reserve, a "sovereign nation" with its own laws. He used a Turtle Island reserve letterhead and his certificate of Indian status (formerly known as a treaty card) to buy tax-free items, such as lumber, and have them delivered to the grow-op site. (Goods sold to residents on a reserve are tax-free.)

Carrying a sacred bundle with a ceremonial pipe into court each day, Agecoutay said the Creator told him to grow medicine to cure cancer and diabetes. "I'm doing the Creator's work," he said after the verdict, adding the jurors may not have understood the issues. "They were not educated in this area."

But some fear Agecoutay's lessons from the witness stand have done more harm. In a letter to the editor, university student Shane Sunshine worried about the implications for "an under-informed public," furthering "false beliefs" about First Nation rights.

"Agecoutay and his accomplices, exploiting the tax-free status of reserves to fund an illegal enterprise will, I fear, give credence to the idea that aboriginals in Canada do not pay taxes. This is a silly idea," Sunshine said.

Both Northwest and a frustrated, unidentified caller to the Leader-Post raised concerns about Agecoutay taking a sacred bundle and the ceremonial pipe it holds into a courtroom, saying their use is for sacred events.

Bill Asikinack, who is Anishinabe, is department head of indigenous studies at the First Nations University of Canada. In explaining people's strong reaction to the case, he noted a person had to earn their leadership in traditional Anishinabe society. "They had to have good qualities about who they were and thus, the people would then follow this person. But they would only follow this person if this person was speaking properly for them," Asikinack said.

He said the Anishinabe nation, which stretches from Lake Ontario to northern B.C., doesn't have a grand chief. "There are traditional leaders and traditional leaders can potentially inherit the position, but they have to earn it by being good people and being people of respect," Asikinack said.

"Turtle Island" is a name most First Nations people use to describe North America, but "there is no reserve called Turtle Island," he said.

After the grow-op was busted in 2005, Pasqua Chief Elaine Chicoose and Lawrence Joseph, then vice-chief of the Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations, said there is a zero tolerance to drugs. Neither returned phone calls from the Leader-Post this week, but Joseph, now FSIN chief, appeared on CTV News on Friday, saying he too was offended by the use of culture as a defence to producing drugs.

bpacholik@leaderpost.canwest.com


http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/new...03380d4&k=86149

[Prairyearth]

Comments or discussions anyone? I will be commenting on all of tis soon.
Prairy

[GhostChild]

LEADER-POST: Can You Produce A "Sovereign License" From "His" Jurisdiction: That Says You Have The Right To Trade And Commerce On "His" Land? I Thought Not: I Will Think On This One: And Then I Will Share It With The World. Further: If The "ABORIGINALS DO NOT KNOW: A GENOCIDE FOR A GEOCIDE HAS OCCURED: If You Vote: You Probably Would Not Know Anything If It Wasn't For The Few Of Us That Break Through YOUR Social Programming To Show What Is There. The Medicine Bundle? You Should Know He Never Does Anything Without Permission....Smarten UP The Lot Of You...The GhostChild.

[wild dog]

If MARIJUANA is a natural herb and used appropriatley and you swear on the bible in the court house that you will SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH why in the bible GENESIS CHAPTER 1 VERSE 29 does it say that God gave us every hearb bearing seed which is upon the face of all the Earth for every man to use,Im not christian I cant stand that forced religion but read this verse this is the systems beleifs they carnt say no to there religion.I have a book here G.C on natural medicines that are facts that I will send aswell as the other info
hope it can help.
WILD DOG

[GhostChild]

Actually......They Can Refuse Their Religious Comandments: (How Ever It Is Spelled)...

As To Build THEIR GENOCIDIAL CORPORATION-[COUNTRIES] Upon The Sovereign Land Of AllOurRelations: They Had To Break Every Comanment In Their God-Instructions. 75 Million Original People Died Here: In The First "Recorded" 20 years of COLONIZATION: And THEY DID IN THE NAME OF THEIR GOD: AND ODDLY STILL DO: As EVERYTHING HAS CHANGED BUT NOTHING HAS CHANGED: AND IT WILL NOT CHANGE AS LONG AS THEY ARE SO SHORT SIGHTED OF THEIR OWN FAILINGS AND GENOCIDIAL BEHAVIOR:
THEY STILL DO NOT UNDERSTAND THEIR ENTIRE GAMBIT/AMBIT Is COMMERCE: THAT IS WHY Our People Live In Third WORLD POVERTY: All Whom Work For GENOCIDIAL CORPORATIONS: Are CROWN EMPLOYEE'S: WHOM ENABLE IT ALL WITH THEIR SLEEPING HABITS: AS THEY ONLY AWAKE WHEN IT AFFECTS THEM. Now What Is CHRISTIAN About That? That At Least 60 per cent Of THEM: Are Christian's: AND AS YOU TELL BY THIS SITE THEY AGREE WITH IT AS THEY SIT IN SILENCE TO IT.....'GEE SORRY ABOUT THE GENOCIDE: BUT SIT DOWN SHUT UP AND OBEY US DAMN YOU' SEEMS TO APPLY HERE AS WELL....AND AGAIN: "REFUSE FOR CAUSE WITHOUT DISHONOR....."

The Odd Thingy Here Is That Every Court Is Supposed To Have An Original "Hemp" Version Of The King James Holy Bible: Most COURTS Hold Some Or Other Bible: In Defiance To THEIR OWn Instructions As To The Lawful Bible To Hold In COURT....Besides: It Does Not Matter: As You Are Sworn To Tell The Truth: But The COURT ONLY ACCEPTS "FACTS IN EVIDENCE" And Holds No Place For The Truth: And Must Always Find In Favor Of The CORPORATION: Over And Above: Any Sovereign Original: As We Are Not Really Allowed To Win Anything...Some Wisely Call This FASCISM: BUT THE CROWN EMPLOYEE'S CAN NOT BE BOTHERED TO CORRECT THE HISTORICAL ERROR'S Or Even The Most Recent......SHAME!

[Prairyearth]

There are no human rights, nor civil rights being observed in the system there. In the lower 48, it was not until 1924 that Native Americans obtained some citizens rights, though they should have had a choice of whether they wanted to be recognized as citizens of the colonist society or not. Instead, they were ordered to appear, UNDER DURESS, especially for the draft, so they would be forced to fight/be used, as citizens in the great world wars whether they wanted to or not. When the wars were over, those who survived, were sent home to the reservations, wounded and broken men, where they were told their "own kind" would take care of them.

It wasn't until 1974 that the Native Indian spirituality was re-instated after a lengthy court battle. All the while, the Native American was forced into a subservient role by a totalitarian government, who never observed the rights of the people's spirituality in the court system, schools or church's. They were forced to go to the white mans church, school and courts against their wishes.

The medicine bundle KaNeeKaNeet took with him to the crowns court was 100% acceptable. If any colonial thinking "Natives" wish to challenge this statement...please do.

The Peoples humble messenger,
Prairyearth

[wild dog]

If you think its any different there then it is here, think again, the only way to win against the system is with BULL SHIT against BULL SHIT,

WILD DOG

[GhostChild]

WildDog Now Apply What You Know About Fire Island: And Take To An INTERNATIONAL LEVEL: The COLONISTS Have Gotten Away With MURDER: THEFT: As Genocide For Geocide.....And THEY Wonder Why We Would Have A Problem With It? COLONIZATION IS THE INTERNATIONAL SCHEME TO REMOVE THE VERY SYSTEM THEY USED TO GET A FOOT HOLD IN MANY Sovereign Lands: By The Illusions Of Monarchy: By The Illusions Of ALIEN LAW: As Some How Over The Original People: No Matter Where You Go...The Factum To Point Out In This Little Mix Of Blood And Poison: Is That All Other EUROPEAN COUNTRY'S LENT THEIR COLONIAL THE BLESSING OF THEIR CHURCHES: All In The Name Of Some GOD: Not The Man Who Walked Out Of The Dessert And Proclaimed And Defended Sovereignty By Example And By Challenge Of The IMPOSED ALIEN LAW: Damn it: Christians Are So Blind By SOCIAL PROGRAMMING.....THEIR ONLY COME BACK TO ALL THAT I HAVE SAID IS EITHER BASED IN STUPITY: OR THE NEED TO REDIRECT AND DEFLECT ALL CRITICISM: That IS Why They Have Removed This Site Everytime.......THEY CENSOR ALL THAT CAN REMOVE THEM.....The GhostChild.

[GhostChild]

[SASKATCHEWAN] I Wish To Share With You Information From SignatoryIndian.com Which As Far As I Can Tell: The CORPORATE FORCES THAT BE: SHUT Them DOWN AND REMOVED Them: Look Closely: For You Will See That Kaneekaneet Is Not The Only One With This Knowledge To Remove You: We Do Not Stand Alone: YOU DO.....The GhostChild.



Welcome to kisikawpimootewin and group(s) website!


Home
Open letter By Kevin Annett to P.M. Paul Martin, 50,000 missing residential school children.
4. Petition Of Right, NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW INCLUDING MONARCHS, 1627
4a. Petition Of Right, NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW INCLUDING MONARCHS ,1860
5. Letter And Petition To Queen's Privy Council For Canada May 13, 2004
5a. Take Notice to the Queen's Privy Council For Canada/ their REFUSAL TO UPHOLD HER MAJESTY'S LAW
5b. Letter to Governor General /Refusal/Queen's Privy Council for Canada/to uphold Her Majesty's Law
6. Letter/Gov.Dept./OF CANADA/PRIVY OFFICE, Indians remain bound under enfranchisement scheme
7. Petition Of Right - Federal Court June 9, 2004
7a. Response/Refusal June 11, 2004 ADMIRALTY COURT OF CANADA/Her Majesty's Law Abolished
7b. Federal Court Act 1970/Admiralty Court/enforcement of current regulations only
8. Letter/Her Majesty/Refusal/by Her Officers/Canada/to uphold Her Majesty's Law/Treason/June16,2004
9. Statement Of Claim
9a. Strategies For Statement Of Claim
9b. Correspondence of kisikawpimootewin and Attorney General re: Statement of Claim
10. Take Notice To All Peoples on miskanahkministik
11. Petition to United Nations Human Rights Commitee, Special Rapporteur
11a. Petition to United Nations Human Rights Committee, Petition Team
11b. Petition sent to the Countries of the World
11c. Take Notice to the People(s) for the World
12. Notice Of Constitutional Questions, October 15, 2004
12a. Notice Of Constitutional Questions, October 15, 2004
The Great Law
The Great Law (compilation of six translations), pgs. 1-5 of 27 pgs.
Great Law pgs. 6 - 11
Great Law pgs. 12 - 17
Great Law pgs. 18 - 22
Great Law pgs. 23 - 27
Links


Under Construction!

Welcome to our open forum website!

All peoples are invited to participate and share their information and knowledge regarding the routing that has enslaved the Peoples of the world, enabling the corporations to destroy our food, water and air, upon pretence of greed for the natural resources and if left unchecked, will lead to the total extinction of all life on the planet.

Routing Used To Enslave The Sovereign Indigenous Peoples


Proposed Routing To Free The Sovereign Indigenous Peoples


Questions, Comments, Suggestions, Post Yours Here In Our Open Forum

Routing Used To Enslave The Non-Indigenous Peoples
�

New Updates

This website is a work in progress, as such we will be adding additional documents on an on going basis. When we make an update, we will list it here.



New Update October 19, 2004:

Notice Of Constitutional Questions,

re: NO JURISDICTION.

Refer to index 12. and 12b.



New Update October 15, 2004:

Open letter by Kevin Annett to P.M. Paul Martin demanding accountability

for 50,000 missing children from residential schools.



Thank you for your patience and for visiting our site.

Please note the scheme of enfranchisement and its provisions

of enslaving the Sovereign Indigenous Peoples under the subject matter jurisdiction titled CANADA. The scheme of the War Measures

Act and its Provisions upon the pretence of order and good government continues to hold Her Majesty's Subjects and the enfranchised Sovereign Indigeous Peoples, in a time of peace, hold in a lawless state of color and force of Martial Law, by ever changing regulations of the titled Canada. If you have any suggestions, or inquiries, please contact us. Contact

Information at the bottom of the page, or join us in our open forum.

We are an open forum research and study group who collectively have journeyed on a path for a number of years accumulating document(s) of the scheme(s) and routing used by the titled CANADA to enslave and by fraud remove the Lawful standing, recognition and right of claim(s) of the referred to and titled separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik (turtle island). We invite any and all to contribute and or assist us in our journey.

By right of Heritage, Custom, Usage and chosen mode(s) of life, I am kisikawpimootewin, bear clan, sentient Human being, Heir and Successor, of a Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples, referred to as NORTH AMERICAN INDIAN(S) on miskanahkministik. I kisikawpimootewin am a Signatory and Beneficiary by adhesion, of accepted offer(s) of the Royal Proclamation, The Will and Pleasure of Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her Heir(s) and Successor(s) as Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heir(s) and Successor(s) (hereinafter Her Majesty) for promise(s), benefit(s) and entitlement(s), under sealed Trust agreement(s) of the oral and written talks and negotiations made Sovereign to Sovereign, for the titled:



1. Friendship Treaties (for the mutual benefits for trade and commerce)



2. Peace Treaties (to keep secure the trade and commerce)

3. Numbered Treaties (entrusting the Sovereign Territories to Her Majesty)

Made with Queen Victoria, Her Heir(s) and Successor(s) as Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heir(s), Successor(s) and Predecessor(s) that apply equally to all or any of the referred to as Tribe(s) or Nation(s) of NORTH AMERICAN INDIAN(S) on the Trust Territories titled Canada. And further are free to enter into Treaties with Her Majesty, at any time or not, regardless of their choice, are always to remain unmolested and free in their Heritage, customs, usage and chosen mode(s) of life on miskanahkministik, for as long as the Sun Shines and the River(s) flow, on the land titled NORTH AMERICA. (Hereinafter Treaties)

-made with-



The sentient Human beings, of separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples, Their Heir(s) and Successor(s) on miskanahkministik, referred to as Tribe(s) or Nation(s) of NORTH AMERICAN INDIAN(S), on the Trust Territories titled Canada (Hereinafter separate and distinct Peoples).

We respectfully submit, for your review, consideration and comments the following information that our group believes is the routing and scheme(s) used by the titled CANADA, to enslave by fraud, to remove the Lawful standing and Right(s) Of Claim, of the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik (turtle island).

The following are Her Majesty's Law (Royal Certified Acts of the Parliament of Great Britain) in compliance to His Majesty King George III, Proclaimed Royal Will and Pleasure of the titled Royal Proclamation, October 7, 1763. That upon pain of displeasure, (meaning at that time, for refusing to obey, committing treason, was death) Her Majesty's loyal subjects are to obey and uphold Her Majesty's Law, and Her Majesty's loyal sworn Officer(s) are to obey, uphold and enforce Her Majesty's Law regarding the Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples, Their Heir(s) and Successor(s) on miskanahkministik of the titled Canada.

Take note: Her Majesty's law stands forever as written and can never be changed or abolished.



His Majesty King George III (Royal Proclamation 1763) and Her Majesty Queen Victoria acknowledged the separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples as Sovereign(s), and their Right Of Claim(s) to their Sovereign Territories on miskanahkministik (turtle island).

Her Majesty Queen Victoria in oral and written negotiations with the Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples entered into formal agreements, Sovereign to Sovereign, binding their Heir(s) and Successor(s) for as long as the Sun Shines and the River(s) flow for the titled Friendship Treaties (for the mutual benefits for trade and commerce) on miskanahkministik, and further entered into oral and written negotiations and agreements to keep secure the titled Friendship Treaties, agreeing that neither side would molest nor harm one another, nor interfere with the Heritage, Customs, Usage, mode(s) of life and Law, of the other, titled Peace Treaties on miskanahkministik. Her Majesty Queen Victoria also made offers to assume as Fiduciary/Trustee the separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples Sovereign Territories, that the Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples, by their choice, could accept, whenever, if ever, the titled Numbered Treaties.(entrusting the Sovereign Territories to Her Majesty)



Enfranchisement is the freedom of choice of one of the Sovereign Peoples of a Sovereign country to request/apply to become one of the Sovereign Peoples of another Sovereign country.



If accepted, they must bind themselves, under subject matter jurisdiction, by sworn oath of allegiance, to only obey and uphold the Law (different from Sovereign country to Sovereign country but at all times, stands as written and ageless, and can never be changed or abolished) for that Sovereign country. Once sworn in, have lawful standing, right of claims, under subject matter jurisdiction, to be secure and protected under law, as one of the Sovereign Peoples of that Sovereign country.



No Sovereign country upon pretence of discretion or by any other means can usurp subject matter jurisdiction and enfranchise Sovereign Peoples of other Sovereign countries.



Even by United Nations conventions of war and conquest, the conquered Sovereign Peoples, must freely swear, an oath of allegiance, to be lawfully bound, under the subject matter jurisdiction and law, of the conquering Sovereign country.



The Lawful standing of the Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples, Their Heirs and Successor(s), Right(s) Of Claim(s), to the binding agreements, and to their Sovereign Territories on miskanahkministik, was removed, in treason, with no authority of Her Majesty’s Law, by fraud, by the titled Enfranchisement of the Sovereign and distinct group(s), their Heir(s) and Successor(s) and its provision(s) of the titled CANADA, that usurped subject matter jurisdiction of the distinct group(s) under the titled Governor of Canada and further by order of the Governor were enslaved under, with forced compliance of current regulation(s) by order(s) of the titled MINISTER and DEPARTMENTS OF INDIAN AND NORTHERN AFFAIRS OF CANADA and INDIAN ACT OF CANADA.

Her Majesty’s Loyal sworn Officer(s) for the Commonwealth Countries swear an oath of allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heirs and Successors and bind themselves to only obey, uphold and enforce Her Majesty’s Law. For refusal are in breach and in dereliction of the performance of there sworn duty to Her Majesty, committing act(s) of treason against Her Majesty.



Her Majesty's Officers for the titled Canada are bound by their sworn oaths of allegiance, to Her Majesty, to only obey, uphold and enforce Her Majesty’s Law, and refuse in dereliction of their performance of their sworn duties to obey, uphold, and enforce the Proclaimed Royal Will and Pleasure of Her Majesty’s Law for the repeal of the enfranchisement of the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples of Canada, and removal of all of its provision(s) and are committing with intent, knowledge and forethought by conspired action(s) and act(s) of treason against the Proclaimed will of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and Her Predecessor(s). And further, have refused in contempt to comply with International Law for the United Nations Conventions of Human Rights.



ie : decisions of July 30, 1981- Lovelace V. Canada (1981) 2H. R. L. J. 158 (UN H. R. C.).



And in contempt, continue to keep the sentient Human beings of Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples, enslaved to a dictator, of the purported title, MINISTER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INDIAN AND NORTHERN AFFAIRS OF CANADA.

And forced compliance to its regulation(s) of the purported title, INDIAN ACT OF CANADA by pretence of provision(s) of the scheme of enfranchisement, of the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples by Order(s) of the purported title as, GOVERNOR OF CANADA.

1b. (found in Routing Used To Enslave The Non-Indigenous Peoples) DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS (highlighted in yellow page 3444) "No matter how parliament might protest under its own laws. They may wish a Mussolini in Italy, a Stalin in Russia or a Hitler in Germany, but we do not need a dictator in Canada; we do not need anyone exercising that sort of arbitrary autocratic authority in this country, the pride and security of British Peoples with respect to all such matters lie in their parliamentary institutions, and this parliament is the body to which the people of Canada must and have a right to look to have taxation controlled, and for peace, order and good government in the true sense of the words."

Take note, the previous Act(s) of MARTIAL LAW were made by the titled CANADA in treason,



The titled CANADA has no authority to make LAW.



Please refer to the index that lists the following correspondence hightlighted in yellow. Petitions and refusals of Her Majesty's Loyal sworn Officer(s) for the Trust Territories titled Canada:



4. Petition Of Right 1627



Please carefully review, you will note, that at that time, the peoples of 1627, were held in a time of peace, in a lawless state, of colour and force of MARTIAL LAW, with no provisions, and in contravention of Her Majesty’s Law, in exactly the same manner, that the Peoples on the Trust Territories titled Canada, are being held under today.



4a. Petition Of Right 1860



Her Majesty's Law, by petition of Right, is the only means in which Her Majesty's Loyal sworn Officer(s) can be held accountable for their refusal, in breach and treason of, their sworn oath(s), of their duty to Her Majesty.

As well as dereliction of their duty, for refusing to obey and uphold Her Majesty's Law.



5. Letter And Petition To Queen's Privy Council For Canada May 13, 20045a. Take Notice, Failure To Respond To Petition By Queens Privy Council For Canada May 25, 2004.



5a. Take Notice, Failure To Respond To Petition By Queens Privy Council For Canada May 25, 2004.



5b. Letter to Governor General /Refusal/Queen's Privy Council for Canada/to uphold Her Majesty's Law.



6. Letter/Gov.Dept./OF CANADA/PRIVY OFFICE, Indians remain bound under enfranchisement scheme.



7. Petition Of Right - Federal Court June 9, 2004.



7a. Response/Refusal June 11, 2004 ADMIRALTY COURT OF CANADA/Her Majesty's Law Abolished.



I bring to your attention (attached herein) to the letter sent to Her Majesty and the Petition of Right, for a claim of Right, brought before Her Majesty's Federal Court For Canada by kisikawpimootewin.



And the response from the purported title; ADMIRALTY COURT OF CANADA, of the alleged "abolishment" of Her Majesty's Law by a department of the purported title;" FEDERAL PARLIAMENT OF CANADA".



As such: Her Majesty's Law has no standing in "CANADA".



Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heir(s) Successor(s) and Predecessor(s) Royal Proclaimed Will and Pleasure is enacted as standing Law by Royal Certified Act (s) of the Parliament of Great Britain. Her Majesty's Law's cannot be abolished. They remain forever as written to be obeyed and upheld at all times.



7b. Federal Court Act 1970/Admiralty Court/enforcement of current regulations only.



8. Letter/Her Majesty/Refusal/by Her Officers/Canada/to uphold Her Majesty's Law/Treason/June16,2004.

We have addressed the aforementioned situation, by Petition and a formal written request to Her Majesty and await Her written response and/or action.

It is our intention, by Petition, to address the aforementioned, before Her Majesty’s Court for Law, of the titled Great Britain. Her Majesty’s Loyal sworn Officer(s) are bound by their oaths of allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heir(s) and Successor(s) to only obey, uphold and enforce Her Majesty’s Law for the security and protection of the peoples of Her Majesty’s Commonwealth Countries.

If Her Majesty’s Loyal sworn Officer(s) for the titled Great Britain fail/refuse to restore Her Majesty’s Law to secure and protect the peoples on the Trust Territories titled Canada and fail/refuse to free and restore the Heritage, Customs and Usage to the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples, on miskanahkministik and/or fulfill Her Majesty’s agreement(s) made with the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik. Upon failure/refusal, Her Majesty forfeit(s), any and all Lawful claims and/or interests to the Trust Territories titled Canada, on miskanahkministik. The separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik, then have lawful standing and Right of Claim(s) to petition the United Nation(s) Security Council to send UN troops to secure and protect the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples, and other peoples on miskanahkministik under International Law, until such time as the Trust Territories titled Canada are returned and under the Heritage, Customs, and Usage of the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik.

Her Majesty's Parliament(s), For Her Dominion(s), have no power or authority to make it's own Law(s). Enacted as Royal Certified Act(s) of the Parliament(s) of Her Dominion(s), are only empowered to make enactment(s) for law. Statutes for enforcement for law as Royal Certified Act(s), of the Parliament of Great Britain. That when published in the Gazette, is law that Her Majesty's Loving Loyal subject(s) and Loyal sworn Officer(s) must obey and uphold. That said, all sentient Human Beings in good conscience should be seeking answers to the following questions:

1. What Legal instrument (Royal Certified Act of the Parliament of Great Britain) empowered and authorized the War Measures Act of 1914. And its provision(s) to dissolve Her Majesty's Dominion of Canada and power and authority of Her Majesty's Law and Parliament For the Dominion of Canada. Usurping subject mater jurisdiction of Her Majesty's Loyal Subject(s) and separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples under colour and force of Marshall Law?



2. Why are Her Majesty's Loyal Subject(s) and separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik, upon pretense of provision(s) of the enfranchisement scheme and upon pretense of provision(s) of order, security and good government of the War Measures Act 1914, held in a lawless state, of colour and force of Marshall Law, as regulations, by order(s) of a self-declared defacto GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL of the purported title CANADA?



3. Why hasn't Her Majesty ordered, or by force, reinstated Her Dominion of Canada, and the power and authority of Her Law to the Parliament of the Dominion of Canada? For the security and protection of Her Majesty's Loyal subjects on miskanahkministik.



4. As justification upon pretense of provision(s) of the enfranchisement scheme and the War Measures Act. Her Majesty's Loyal sworn Officer(s) appointed as commissioner(s) acting for the self-declared defacto GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL of the purported title CANADA in dereliction of duty are in treason of their sworn oath to Her Majesty. They refuse to obey and uphold Her Majesty's Law, treaties, agreements and obligation(s) therein made with the separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik.



5. Why hasn't Her Majesty ordered or addressed:

The dereliction of duty in treason of sworn oaths for Her Majesty's Loyal sworn Officer(s)?


The refusal to obey and uphold Her Majesty's Law as Royal Proclamation and peace, Friendship (Trade and Commerce) and Numbered Treaties and law relating thereto made with the separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik Sovereign to Sovereign?

6. Her Majesty's Loyal sworn Officer(s) have no power or authority, to refuse, amend or abolish Her Majesty's Treaties, agreement(s) and Law relating to the Peace and Friendship (trade and commerce) Treaties and Numbered Treaties made with the Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik.

Nor to negotiate and make additional agreement(s) and purported Land claim Treaties with the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik. By what power or authority does the self-declared defacto GOVERNOR of the purported title of CANADA, have legal standing, to bind the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik? Upon pretense of purported Land claims referred to as Treaties, negotiated with it's appointed employed representatives of its Departments of the titled FEDERAL and PROVINCIAL GOVERNING STRUCTURES and the titled INDIAN BAND(S)?



7. By Her Majesty's action or lack thereof to secure and protect Her Majesty's Loving Loyal Subject(s) on miskanahkministik. Or to uphold and enforce the aforementioned Treaties, made with the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik. Has Her Majesty forfeited any and all claim or rights on miskanahkministik?



8. Should not the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik and other Peoples on miskanahkministik, petition the United Nations Human Rights Committee, to be freed from a lawless state, of the self-declared defacto GOVERNOR of the purported title CANADA? To be secure and protected under International Law? Until such time as the Trust Territories are returned, and under control, by Heritage, Custom(s) and Law(s) of the Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik?



9. Her Majesty's Loyal sworn Officer(s) appointed as Commissioner(s) or Minister(s) acting for the self- declared defacto GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL of the purported CANADA ADMIRALTY COURT declare and note the existence of Her Majesty's Law, but has no standing, force or effect. They only uphold and enforce the current regulation(s) by order(s) of the said, GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL.

(ie; GST, busing school children. COURT ruling: GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL must comply with own regulation(s), order(s). In response, changed the regulation(s), order(s).)
Does not the ADMIRALTY COURT'S of case law (colour of Martial Law) make a mockery of the administration, injustice for Her Majesty's Law?

If you have any questions, comments or suggestions, please forward to:
E-mail - kisikawpimootewin@signatoryindian.com
web site - signatoryindian.tripod.com

Or Join Us In Our Open Forum http://signatoryindian.tripod.com/forum/